Well, Tomorrow is Valentine’s Day, and I’m in the Usual Fix

What is it about holidays like Valentine’s Day? We’ve forgotten how to behave, really; I know I have. When I was a child, we would make out a little card with a cloying and inoffensive sentiment and a cute, if hamfisted, picture of a bear, or a cupid, or putti; and then we’d distribute them to all our classmates, boys and girls, it didn’t matter, and get them in return. We were but children, and the idea of the front window display of Victoria’s Secret was very far in the future for adults, never mind a child.

Why does every modern expression of affection have to consist of: Can you top this?

You know exactly what I mean. People don’t get down on one knee and ask for the fair hand of their beloved until death do them part any more. No, that isn’t histrionic enough; you need to dress in a gorilla suit, and get on the jumbotron at the basketball game to propose formally these days, or take out a billboard ad, or send a stripper balloon-a-gram to her law office now, lest you seem, well, too ordinary to be marriageable. Among many people, the alternate pole shows itself, and marriage proposals simply consist of : “You’re what? Well, I guess we can cohabit until something better comes along.”

Celebrities aren’t helping, of course. It is an immutable law the the more elaborate the wedding foo-fa-raw involved in celebrities’ banns and nuptuals, the shorter it will last. Look up Kenny Chesney and Renee Zellwegger if you don’t know what I’m talking about. And the rest of us normal folks, who are disinclined to rent an entire island to stand on the beach in a leather stetson and bare feet to propose are stuckwith the image in the general public’s head that this is how normal people should behave too.

They call it Victoria’s Secret, you know — they don’t call it Bella Abzug’s Secret for a reason. The idea, as expressed in the Victorian ethic, was that an expression of affection could be quite straightforward, and chaste, and still have the shared knowledge that it was backed up with, well, how can I say it politely? They had thirteen children each, didn’t they?

I remember the first time I saw a Victoria’s Secret catalog. It had about ten pages at first, and I can still recall the slack- jawed amazement visible on the faces of the fellows in the very disreputable looking tavern I was in when they showed it to me. They understood immediately what Victoria’s Secret itself has long since forgotten: A glimpse of hose is worth a pound of pornography.

I’d like to find some appropriate way to acknowledge the day without trying to outdo the Ardor Pizzaros looking to conquer new worlds of WOW! in histrionic shows of feigned affection. There really isn’t any show of affection too good for my beloved, but I don’t have the heart to go Nuclear on Valentine’s Day, and I’ve lost the knack of the small immortelle along with my brethren. But I trust some day she will visit the boneyard where I’ll live when the mortgage is paid off, finally, and think: You know, he was a knucklehead, but I’m pretty sure he really loved me.

Victorian Lacework Valentines

Revenge of the Plumbing — Part Two

Well, as even casual readers of this humble essayist no doubt remember, I tried to talk my ten-year-old son out of following in his father’s footsteps and taking up the trombone. It’s plumbing, not music, I told him. There’s a trick to it, and the operator really doesn’t swallow the slide like a sword swallower. It’s not that interesting. I even told him jokes about trombones:

What do you do if you find a trombone player on your front porch?

Pay him for the pizza.

Well, day follows night; the orb rises in the east, sets in the west; wrack follows ruin; and last night we went to the big one’s school to hear him, for the first time, play his… ahem… trombone in the school orchestra.

Now keep in mind I have a two year old as well, and I only got to hear the Big One’s snappy numbers between chasing the little Woad Raider up and down the hall and operating the bubbler. (that’s a water fountain for all you heathens that didn’t go to parochial school in Massachusetts as I did)

Every single child in our public school fifth and sixth grade participates in the music program, and our boy is in the orchestra, the jazz band, and the chorus too, so you can imagine how many drinks of water the whole dancecard lasted. But even though I heard a substantial portion of the proceedings over the incessant giggling of the “bubbling” Wee One, while peering through the wire glass of the entry door to the auditorium, I can assure you it was wonderful.

They played the Star Spangled Banner. I’d forgotten how trombone-centric that one is. It’s a touching scene, no many how many times you hear see it; people coming together over common themes to make common cause over a common denominator of musical patriotism.

They played it well, and I could see my boy working the slide, and my mind drifted back thirty years and I could still picture the interesting and stirring counterpoint part he was playing in my head, and my arm almost starting making the motions: First position, then fourth, fifth, sixth…

But it’s not my show any more, it’s for me, not about me now, and all the better. I performed music for a long time, and still occasionally do, and was successful — as far as that went — for one reason: someone, early on, disabused me of the notion that it was about the people on the stage. Everyone pays lip service to that ideal, but in practical terms it’s become nonsense. Popular music is all about personality cult, where the audience affirms its own worth by propping up the self-worth of the idols of their choosing. Many performers have dispensed with the formality of music in their musical entertainments altogether, and simply hurl singsong run-on sentences of complaint into the ether, like they’re exhorting a mob of Mother Goose readers to burn down the Old Lady’s Shoe.

As long as I was performing regularly, I had essentially lost my ability to be entertained. I literally did not know how to behave in an audience. I was “facing the right way.” I was used to “facing the wrong way,” a shorthand term we had for performing.

Well, my boy was facing the wrong way now. And for the first time in a long time, I was entertained.

And a little proud. Shameful, huh?

Back To Bristol

Well, perhaps you’ll recall our sojourn to Bristol Rhode Island last August. As the British would say, it was beastly hot. The British also coined the term Bristol Fashion. It means maintained in an exemplary fashion, and usually refers to anything painted and varnished to a fare-thee-well.

Well, Bristol Rhode Island aint. Bristol fashion, that is. There’s a good deal of it that could use a coat of paint; but I’m not complaining. Neatness above all things doesn’t manifest itself in a Bristol Fashion anymore, it manifests itself as vinyl siding. I’ll take the peeling paint over that.

But Bristol is clean of litter, and it shows itself as what people use to call “snug.” It’s pleasant, and not ostentatious, and most everyone was friendly, and there were interesting things to look at, not monuments to be awestruck over.

Here’s another doorway from the main drag:


What you’re looking at there, is Victorian exuberance. It’s probably not original equipment on the house, which has a very austere Adam Colonial bones under the doorway confectionary. The owner of the house, reacting to the zeitgeist of the postbellum period decide to keep up with the Second Empire joneses down the street. So he added this endearingly odd hood over his front entry, which is only a few feet from the sidewalk so I assume he really wanted you to see it, on what is and probably always was a busy street, in a style popular in Stick Style and later, Queen Anne.

Officially, that’s called a bracketed console entry, for you folks keeping score. Look at it. It keeps the rain off your head while you’re waiting for someone to answer your knock, but what a way to do it. “Victorian” became synonymous with a kind of staid uptight outlook on life, and gloomy houses. The Adams Family didn’t reside in a split level ranch on their TV show, after all.

The people who wanted to replace the Victorians political, social, and artistic outlook managed to associate them with frippery, frigidity, and glumness. No mean feat, that, the demonization of the most successful several generations of people in the history of the world. And if they were so uptight, and we’re so sophisiticated, why did they have six kids each, and we have two? I’ve never seen them, but I assume the duck’s feet are moving if he’s gliding across the pond.

The reason there are so few really outlandish Victorian era homes still in their original condition has to do with the upkeep necessary to keep them going, no question; but that’s only part of the story. A lot of it was razed, or made unrecognizable by hacking away at any vestige of the gimcrackery and stylishness on purpose. I live in a town that was developed mainly as a Victorian seaside resort, and everybody sees the shingled houses downtown now and associates that with preservation of antiquity. I go there, and see house after house that used to be embellished like that picture above, and not just the front entry; clapboarded, gingerbreaded, polychrome, internationally astute but not slavish technically — the supreme borrowers, the Victorians — and they were hacked up and covered with the turn of the century vinyl siding: shingles.

And so we’re stuck with “form follows function,”” less is more,” and “to deliberately make a buiding beautiful is a crime.” Sometimes I wish the founding fathers of brutalist architecture were all still alive, so I could attend their funerals and blow party noisemakers, with my wife in a red dress.

I wouldn’t mind waiting under that little roof for someone to answer the door, would you? I wouldn’t mind living across the street from it either. Remember: Love thy neighbor; paint thy house. A little exuberant style never hurt either.

Month: February 2006

Find Stuff:

Archives