Megan McArdle = Pauline Kael


[I would like to get two things out of the way before we begin. One: I don’t give a fig if Pauline Kael actually said the quote attributed to her, and I double plus don’t care to listen to any “evidence” to the contrary, or in support of the provenance of the quote for that matter. Two: Megan McArdle is a perfectly cromulent writer for the blog with which she’s been entrusted.]

I don’t read all that much stuff on these here Intertubes. I’m busy, and since I’m a content generator now, I busy myself with writing barely readable, worthless text. I’m not that big a consumer.

I did read quite a bit for a while, just to see what everyone’s about. It doesn’t take long to figger out who’s who and what’s what. But I have little interest in going to Memeorandum every day and seeing what everyone’s interested in. I already know what I’m interested in.

So ipso facto I’m a content generator, not so much a consumer, and I’ll confine my remarks to the production side of things. Someone pointed me to the remarks by Megan McArdle at the Atlantic, and they struck me funny. But because I’m a little different, It seems that I’m the only one that had the reaction I did.

Pauline Kael is famous for supposedly uttering the opinion that Nixon couldn’t have won because she didn’t know anybody that voted for him. And now Megan McArdle says everybody that she knows that could possibly write an economics blog already has one, or isn’t interested:

I was at lunch with some blog people today, one of whom wants to recruit an economics blogger and asked for names. I basically drew a blank. All of the high-traffic economics bloggers I read are either professors, in some similarly rewarding profession, or already tied up by a media organization.
I think this is becoming broadly true of the wider blog world: the biggest bloggers are either professionals, or they have an even more lucrative job.

The comments were interesting, and a few bright people I know from blog correspondence like Tim Worstall appeared with cogent comments, but I couldn’t shake off one little aspect of the whole idea as stated.

Megan says her Rolodex is fresh out of names of people who are willing, capable, and have the credentials to blog about economics. Who’s left out of her equation? Why, anyone who would know the first thing about economics.

You see, I couldn’t care less what people like Paul Krugman have to say about economics, because if they worked for me, they’d be qualified to sweep the floor and get us all lunch. You can indulge any sort of bizarre idea about economics if you have a sinecure. Hell, you have to be careful about the pronouncements of people who are already successful in the business world, as they have the money to indulge in all sorts of strange ideas now, too. I don’t really care what Warren Buffett thinks about what people that ride the bus should be doing. How the hell would he know? How the hell would an academic?

Megan McArdle, who is very bright and lively to read, says that all the people with sinecures are taken, so the game’s up. She’s not dumb. She’s blind.

Perhaps I’ve been too harsh to compare her to Pauline Kael, although Kael certainly was a very fine writer, so it’s not really less than a left-handed compliment. But my impression of economists, or more precisely people scribbling about economic matters, is that with a few exceptions, you’d all be much better off to be just like Mike Rowe, out in the landscape looking in wonder at things that average people do to make the world, and everything economic, go around. At least Mike Rowe doesn’t think he knows enough about anything to be placed in charge of the affairs of others, like most economists, academics, and writers do. He’s just inquisitive and deferential and lively.

A thermometer is not a weather god. Mind your own business, the whole lot of you, and pay attention to the people who know how an economy actually functions. Here’s a hint: You will never find even one of them in Washington DC. Not one.

The Only Movie I’ve Liked In The Last Five Years

Maybe ten.

Some things are magnificent to look at, and to contemplate. I’m hard pressed to come up with a comparable melding of cinematography and music. Lawrence of Arabia? Nothing’s better than that. This isn’t that good. Just better than everything else.

Everybody was asleep when I watched it, so the volume was very low, and all the charcters mumbled and grunted or whispered anyway, so almost every word spoken was inaudible to me. Didn’t really matter.

When I was young, I read Dumas, Scott, Stevenson Kipling, London, Irving, Twain, Hawthorne…

Never mind. I was lost in a reverie. It’s a pleasant place to go, from time to time.

Ten bucks. Heh. Deuce Bigalow Male Gigolo is eighteen. There’s Hollywood for you.

Please Make It Stop

I am a lover of houses.

To be a lover of houses, you really have to be a lover of people. Houses used to be inextricably linked to the people that inhabited them. That’s slipping a bit. More than a bit. A lot. Damn it, there’s been a wholesale destruction of the concept.

There, I said it, and I’m glad.

I’ve made all sorts of things, many house-like. I make furniture now. So I still have something to do with houses. I’ve recently gotten a look at all the shows on cable TV that feature the purchase, renovation, decoration, or sale of a house as a sort of American Idol bloodsport, and I don’t like what I see. Here’s why:

I used to renovate houses fairly often, sometimes really ancient ones. I always was attentive for what was considered part of the essential fabric of the house, and noted how often I was charged with ripping out and replacing things that had been added or changed by the occupants, based on fads that come and go.

All the shows I saw based the rehabilitation of homes– some were new houses, too– on what I consider very ephemeral fashion. But a house is not garment. You are making long term decisions with short term design elements. The house itself is a two or three hundred year decision, or could be, if you remember to put batteries in your smoke alarms.

I started early in life in this business, so I’ve already seen all the mistakes that popular renovation culture makes. The cutting edge stuff you’re picking out at Home Depot? I’ve already ripped it out of houses –twice– in the last twenty-five years, while the homeowner said: “What were those people thinking?”

As far as the renovation TV zeitgeist, the only overarching theme I see is that even people of modest means are now taking advantage of the services of buyer agents, decorators, and landscape and house designers that may or may not be contractors. Only the very wealthy used to do that. I like to see people of moderate means establishing households and being happy. Call me a soft touch, if you will, but I’m hardly a snob about such matters.

The customers’ attitude is generally a kind of profound confusion. They have no frame of reference about the beauty, utility, or value of one thing, never mind all the things together. So they invite people in to spend their money and tell them what to like. And with few exceptions, they’re inviting the wrong people.

I’ve seen many wonderful and terrible things. I’ve watched women in open-toed shoes performing demolition. I’ve seen the Village People do plumbing. I’ve seen an Amazon woman whip out house redesigns, some quite fetching, like she’s winding a watch. I’ve seen ex-football players make a kind of frat-house tree fort for a homeowner to hide from his wife in. Norm Abram is still rattling around on the periphery. And after taking it all in, I only have one thing to say:

If I see one more room with everything powder blue and cocoa brown, glass tile, and industrial knobs on everything, I’m going to climb right through the screen and kill someone.

When The Junk On The Walls Was (Still) Real

I’ve been in a thousand roadhouses. Paint peeling from tin ceilings, yellow pine floors stained with the offal of a million benders and scoured clean by the grit of numberless shoes. The neon winks at you. The Men’s room door is on its fifty-fourth set of hinges, the room itself is on its third cleaning in forty years. There are bowling trophies and fish heads and incongruous signs on the walls all donated by the denizens — some of whom are half forgotten but in attendance, others always present but dead. The glasses aren’t clean but beer comes in its own glass, and you can order it by holding up your fingers. The pool table lists to port a bit; after 11:00 PM the patrons do too, so all is well. The quarters, stacked like a tower in Pisa, signal “next game” ’til tomorrow and then some anyway.

There’s a stage, capacious enough for an anorexic to tell jokes from, with four people, their instruments and equipment, and a full drum kit on it. The singer wanders the floor anyway. He sings into a bus station microphone, whispering in it like a lover, or alternately screaming into it like a Stanley Kowalski sort of lover, and peppers his delivery with winks at pretty girls and harmonica playing like a distant elegaic train whistle on the prairie at night.

The guitar is a Fender Stratocaster, of course; it’s strung with strings like cable, and you never hear a note unless it’s intended. You can’t mash them all around. The amplifier is right behind him, that player, and if he swings his hips — he does– the sound shakes the strings into a sort of harmonic frenzy, and he rides the rising howl like a surfer does a wave, and then swings the neck away and the shimmering tone of the plucked chord returns to the slow boil.

There’s a lot of space in the music. The bass is an anchor. The drummer could make do with just a high hat and snare. His right foot is like a piston driving a pile. He moves his stick to the ride cymbal, and you sense that the bell of the cymbal is a world away from the edge.

The guitarist knows what he is doing, and never plays what is being sung; he winds his counterpoint around the vocal like a vine on a drainpipe, and the beautiful rainwater courses down inside, splashes down in the garden, the curb, the gutter — into the very earth. It rises again from that earth, and forms melancholy clouds, scudding across the musical horizon, then brings the cool, gentle rain down on all of our heads, which cleanses and anoints us.

Your girlfriend goes home with the bass player, of course.

Busy

Today’s throughput. There are two more piles just like this one, partially finished. I’m a road warrior today. Gasoline costs $3.45? The filling station shuts you off like a drunk at a bar at $75. Who knew? I haven’t been outdoors in a year, it seems to me.

I guess I shouldn’t have worn long underwear. It’s eighty.

Happy April 22nd!

Today is a big anniversary for anyone born in the fifties. An event of profound importance is commemorated on this date every year now — first popularized, of course, in the seventies.

What? What the hell are you talking about? Yeah, yeah, littering is bad. But what the hell are you people picking through your trash like raccoons for, and calling it Christmas? Never mind all that. It’s Peter Frampton’s birthday!

Excuse me, I have to go cut down a tree and make it into something useful.

(Still) No Admittance

[Editor’s Note: He’s got two or three deadlines to meet, so you get a rerun from years gone past.]
{Author’s Note: Don’t worry, everybody has Internet Alzheimer’s and can’t remember what they read two days ago. They probably don’t even remember that there is no editor.}


What shall we talk about today?

By the time you are reading this, I’ll be pushing wood through a saw. I have help occasionally, but for the most part it is a solitary thing.

Many people used to work in solitary endeavors, or in small groups. Those types of situations are becoming much more common again, and many more people are joining the ranks of the fractured work force, as I have. I think it’s better in many ways.

There is an image I have in my head of the average denizen of the office building. It is not an imaginary image, as I have worked there myself. It occurs to me that it it is the office building filled with information workers that is old-fashioned, not me and my version of the work picture.

The office building is the text version of belching smokestack-noon whistle-timecard punching-id badge-break room-factory of my youth. The cubicles and the old CRTs and the in and outboxes are the assembly line of text now. That’s the modern version of the old sepia colored photo of a humming factory. You nice folks with the boxy shoes and skinny glasses and the Blackberrys and ACT folders open are the buggy whip people now. You are the people who used to wear coveralls and carry a sandwich in a pail and grind it out until you get a watch and bed with a lid. Not me.

The idea that you’d all congregate in one place made sense when there was a smelter in the back. The smelter is a server now, and you probably don’t even know where it is. There is little reason to congregate in one place between low-pile carpeting and drop ceilings just to think. It is unlikely people will continue to do so much longer.

I have a network of persons to help me when I need it. That pool is too small, but not inconsiderable. We congregate when it is necessary. We generally each have the tools we need available to us wherever we are, or go. We buy components and materials and machinery from people we will never meet, and sell the fruits of these constantly shifting associations to other persons we may never meet. In the past, I’ve even occasionally worked in occupied homes and never met the occupants. It’s not always necessary.

The little shelf outside the HR office with the brightly colored forms. The vending machine. The bagels laid out before all but the most hardy clerk arrives by a contractor no one has ever met. It’s all going the way of the dodo. You cutting edge old-fashioned people are going to have to learn to live in the world outside the office tower. The world is booming, and it’s kinda scary if your sun is of the fluorescent variety. Be brave, and do not allow yourself to be taken advantage of by those that say they can put the workplace genie back in the bottle.

I bet you’ll like it out here.

How Do I Explain Mrs. Cottage?

I’ve been married for almost two decades. I don’t know anything about my wife.

I imagine I know her better than anyone else at this point. Maybe her parents knew the little girl they raised better than I, but she is gone into a person now.

My wife is quiet and mysterious. I talk all the time and am mysterious. It’s not a bad combination. We have made children together, and raised them a little. Everything good about them reminds me of her. There’s more good than bad.

Marriage is a decision. It used to be a profound decision, and so most people took it seriously. It’s more or less morphed into a cultural ornament, one considered a little threadbare by the hipsters. My fellow countrymen mostly bounce like a tennis ball between marrying every person they meet, serially, or ignoring the whole ritual and coupling without any title.

If you decide to marry, really decide, it helps you to stay that way. Because if it’s no big deal, you feel no compunction to gauge your behavior for the long haul. You’re figuring you can act like a jerk to a series of people.

If I was cruel to my wife, I would have to look at her for the rest of my life in regret. I am far from perfect and so I do have my regrets. My wife is one of those people who will be buried someday and no one will remember a single bad thing about her. You will not be able to find any sane person to make an unkind remark about her. You’ll be able to form a Roman Legion of my detractors.

So, as I said, I do have my regrets. But I have never once regretted asking my wife to marry me. And I certainly don’t regret that she is too inscrutable for me to figure out if she’s regretted marrying me for every waking moment of half her life.

Month: April 2008

Find Stuff:

Archives